|
|
Explosive Nucleosynthesis
The study of nuclear reaction rates in explosive astrophysical
environments is one of the important frontiers of nuclear
astrophysics [e.g., M. Wiescher, H. Schatz, and A.E. Champagne,
Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. London A 356 (1998) 2105].
Observations suggest that nova explosions and x-ray bursts occur in
close binaries in which the hydrogen-rich material from the outer
layers of an extended star is overflowing its Roche lobe and
accreting onto the surface of its companion, a white dwarf or a
neutron star, respectively. In such explosive events, the
temperatures and densities involved are sufficiently high so that
proton and alpha-particle induced nuclear reactions can be fast
enough to bypass beta-decay processes. These nuclear reactions
involving radioactive nuclei can greatly increase both the rate of
energy generation and the total amount of energy produced and can
have a dramatic impact on both the isotopic and elemental
abundances produced.
During the past three years, our group is focusing its efforts
primarily on this area of explosive nucleosynthesis, determining
the rates of reactions involving radioactive nuclei in events such
as nova explosions and x-ray bursts. Our work includes both
stable-beam experiments (locating important resonances and
measuring their spectroscopic properties) and direct
radioactive-beam measurements of those rates.
Recently, our experiments have concentrated on the properties of
the key 18F(p,a) resonance
(Ecm=664 keV) and on the reaction sequence,
14O(a,p)17F(p,g)18Ne(a,p)21Na(p,g)22Mg which can be important both as a
breakout path from the Hot CNO cycle to the rp-process and as a
possible path for the production of 22Na in x-ray
bursts. The 1274-keV gamma ray from the decay of 22Na is
almost certainly the next gamma-ray line which will be discovered
with the new generation of Gamma-Ray satellites which will be
launched in the next 2 years. During the next three years we expect
to continue to pursue these areas, using both coincidence
spectroscopy measurements with our new silicon-strip array and
direct radioactive beam studies.
a. The 18F(p,a)
Reaction
The observation of gamma rays associated with nova explosions
would provide a very important constraint on nova models. The most
intense gamma rays immediately after a nova explosion are expected
to be the 511-keV annihilation radiation associated with the
positron decay of 13N and 18F. However, the
short 13N half-life means that the nova envelope will be
too opaque during the time scale of the 13N decay
(t1/2 » 10 minutes) to let
those gamma rays escape, and therefore the most significant source
of 511-keV gamma rays during the first several hours after the
explosion is expected to be the decay of 18F
(t1/2 » 110 minutes). The
amount of 18F that will be available as a source for
such decays in the outer envelope is limited by the destruction of
18F during the explosion via the 18F(p,a)15O reaction. Without a better
determination of the rate of this reaction, it is impossible to
understand why recent attempts to detect this radiation have
failed.
Our earlier
spectroscopy studies and the initial 18F-beam
experiments at both Argonne and Louvain have suggested that an
s-wave resonance at Ecm=660 keV plays the dominant role
in determining the rate of the 18F(p,a) reaction in its competition with the 18F(p,g) reaction in nova
explosions and x-ray bursts; the competition between thesereactions determines whether these seed nuclei are recycled back to
the Hot CNO cycle or are passed on to the rp-process via
19Ne. In our more recent studies of this resonance, we
have utilized both stable-beam measurements [transfer reactions
such as 12C(10B,t)19Ne] and direct
measurements at this resonance using radioactive beams to study
both 18F+p elastic scattering and the
18F(p,a) reaction.
The results of our 18F beam measurements at HRIBF
(Ecm = 664.7 ± 1.6 keV, G
= 39.0 ± 1.4 keV, Gp/Gtot =
0.39 ± 0.02) are sufficiently more precise than the previous
measurements that it can be argued that they can be considered to
have superceded the results of the earlier experiments.
b. The 14O ®
22Mg Reaction Sequence
In current models of nova explosions,
the energy generation and nucleosynthesis at temperatures of T£ 0.4 GK are determined by the Hot CNO
cycle,
12C(p,g)13N(p,g)14O(b+n)14N(p,g)15O(b+n)15N(p,a)12C.
As the temperature and density on the surface of the accreting
star increase, however, a-particle induced
reactions on the 14O and 15O nuclei become
faster than the corresponding b+
decays, and in X-ray bursters the star may then breakout from the
Hot CNO cycle to the rp-process, providing a way to further enhance
the rate of energy generation. Based on present nuclear physics
information, the initial breakout path is thought to occur through
the 15O(a,g)19Ne
reaction. At higher temperatures (T³
0.8 GK) the
14O(a,p)17F(p,g)18Ne(a,p)21Na(p,g)22Mg
sequence provides an alternate bridge to the rp-process. The
relative roles of the 15O- and 14O-bridges to
the rp-process depend on the cross-sections of these reactions
under extreme conditions of temperature and density.
The 14O ®
22Mg Reaction Sequence Þ
The 14O(a,p)17F
Reaction
At high temperatures and densities, 14O may be burned
by the 14O(a,p)17F
point and increasing the energy generation in X-ray bursts,
altering the isotopic abundances produced, and possibly leading to
the synthesis of heavier elements via the rp-process. The rate of
the 14O(a,p)17F
reaction is expected to depend critically on the properties of
certain resonances in the compound nucleus, 18Ne. In
particular, a Jp=1- state near
Ex=6 MeV (together with its interference with the
non-resonant direct reaction cross section) is expected [8] to
dominate the rate of this reaction at temperatures in the range
T<1.0 GK.
We have therefore studied the 1H(17F,a)14O reaction (the time-inverse of
the 14O(a,p)17Fgs reaction), using a
radioactive 17F beam at HRIBF. Recoiling 14O
ions were detected in coincidence with a-particles in an array of silicon strip detectors. An
excitation function of the (p,a) reaction
cross section was measured over the entire energy range of interest
for the 14O(a,p)17F
reaction, 1.0 £ Eacm £ 2.6 MeV. Properties of 18Ne
states with 6.0 £ Ex £ 7.6 MeV
were determined, including the important Jp=1- state. The direct reaction cross section
and its interference with the 1- state were also
measured, allowing - for the first time - the 14O(a,p)17Fgs reaction rate to
be determined with reasonable certainty for temperatures important
for novae and X-ray bursts. The design of this experiment was
similar to the ATLAS 1H(17F,a)14O experiment [9], but the combination of
the better beam emittance at HRIBF tandem and the 21 days of beam
time that were made available there allowed the HRIBF experiment to
produce a more definitive data set.
One aspect of the determination of this reaction rate that still
needs to be addressed is the role of the 14O(a,p1)17F*(g)17Fgs reaction. This will
be addressed in a study of
17F(p,p1)17F* inelastic
scattering
The 14O ®
22Mg Reaction Sequence Þ
The 17F(p,g)18Ne
Reaction
For this sequence to proceed further, the 17F(p,g)18Ne reaction must be faster than
17F beta decay. The rate for this reaction is determined
by the s-wave (Jp=3+) resonance
which Bardayan found at Ec.m.=599.8±1.5 keV
(Ex=4.524 MeV ) with G=18±2 keV, as part of his PhD thesis work at
HRIBF. While this resonance is now precisely located, there still
remains a factor of ~ 2 uncertainty in the
strength of this resonance, associated with the unmeasured Gg for this state. Our proposal to
measure the strength of this resonance by a direct
1H(17F, 18Ne) g experiment was approved by the HRIBF PAC-4 (Feb.
1999) and identified as the #2 priority for that facility (second
only to the 1H(7Be,8B)g proposal). The 1H(17F,
18Ne) g experiment is currently
waiting for the implementation of the windowless gas target system
(Fall-2000) and the development of adequate 17F beam
intensity (Summer-2001 ?).
The 14O ®
22Mg Reaction Sequence Þ
18Ne(a,p) and
21Na(p,g) Resonances
The structure of 22Mg has previously been studied
primarily through the two-nucleon transfer reactions
(3He,n) and (p,t) which proceed primarily through the
direct reaction mechanism, selectively populating 2-particle and
2-hole states in 22Mg. Although much progress has been
made in determining the structure of 22Mg through these
experiments, including a recent TRIUMF/CNS-Tokyo remeasurement of
the 24Mg(p,t)22Mg reaction, the spectroscopic
information needed for astrophysics studies is still incomplete.
Additional studies using nuclear reactions that proceed through
different mechanisms (and therefore have different selectivities
for populating 22Mg excited states) could shed
additional light on the location of key 21Na+p and
18Ne+a resonances which may be
relevant to explosive nucleosynthesis.
We are therefore currently members of several collaborations
carrying out measurements of a variety of reactions using
complementary facilities at Yale, Argonne, and TRIUMF, as outlined
below. At Yale we have been using the
12C(16O,6He)22Mg.
reaction to locate new resonances in the energy regions just above
the 21Na+p and 18Ne+a
threshold, and we are now initiating a program to measure the
proton and a-particle decay of these
22Mg states. At Yale we are also collaborating with
Caggiano and Rehm from Argonne in a study of 22Mg states
using the
25Mg(3He,6He)22Mg
reaction, while at Argonne we are part of a collaboration led by
Rehm using the time-reversed 21Na(p,a)18Ne reaction to study the
18Ne(a,p)21Na
resonances. At TRIUMF we are part of collaborations led by Shotter
and by D'Auria that will use a 21Na beam to study
21Na(p,p) elastic scattering and to directly measure the
21Na(p,g) reaction rate,
respectively.
12C(16O,6He)22Mg: By
making use of the Yale Split Pole with its focal-plane detector
(calibrated by utilizing 16O beams with energies of 72,
84, and 90 MeV to generate a set of 9 peaks corresponding to the
ground state and first and second excited states of
22Mg), we were able to find a total of 19 new levels in
22Mg and to measure their centroid energies with a
precision of 10-20 keV [Alan Chen, PhD Thesis, 1999]. One of these
new levels is just above the 21Na+p threshold
(Ex = 6.041 MeV; Ecm = 540 keV) and could be
an important 21Na(p,g)
resonance; this level is consistent with the level found at 6.046
MeV in the recent TRIUMF/CNS-Tokyo
24Mg(p,t)22Mg measurement and with the level
found at 6.051 MeV in the parallel set of measurements which we
have carried out in a study of the
25Mg(3He,6He)22Mg
reaction at Yale, using our split-pole spectrometer in
collaboration with Caggiano and Rehm from Argonne.
The figure to the right
displays the 18 other new levels which we located in our
measurements of the
12C(16O,6He)22Mg
reaction in the region just above the 18Ne+a threshold (0<Ecm<3 MeV) which was
almost completely unexplored before our study. On the basis of
these results the calculated rate NA<sv> for this reaction is
increased by roughly a factor of 10 compared to the earlier model
calculations.
In order to better determine the rate of the
18Ne(a,p)21Na
reaction and to thus gain a clearer picture of its role in
explosive nucleosynthesis, further studies of the structure of
22Mg are needed - in particular, experiments to measure
the partial widths and spins and parities of these resonances, as
well as their strengths. Progress in measuring the partial widths
of these resonances can be made by using stable beam reactions to
populate these states and to then detect their decay products. We
are currently starting a series of such measurements at Yale using
our split-pole spectrometer coupled to a large-solid-angle silicon
array, as described below.
Complementary techniques for determining the strengths of these
18Ne(a,p)21Na
resonances involve the use of radioactive beams of either
18Ne (e.g., the Ph.D. thesis work of Bradfield-Smith who
studied the 18Ne(a,p)21Na reaction directly, bombarding a
thick 4He target with a 18Ne beam at
Louvain-la-Neuve) or 21Na (e.g., via the time-reversed
reaction 21Na(p,a)18Ne - ATLAS Proposal #691, Rehm et al.).
As an example of the complementary nature of the radioactive-beam
measurements and stable-beam spectroscopy studies, after the
initial 18Ne-beam measurements at Louvain found
18Ne(a,p) resonances at
Ex=10.990, 11.050, and 11.130 MeV, our more extensive
results were then used by the Louvain experiment to plan a second
set of lower energy studies which are still under analysis. Our
12C(16O,6He)22Mg
results are also being using in planning the bombarding energies
for the ANL 21Na(p,a)18Ne experiment.
The 18Ne(a,p)21Na
and 21Na(p,a)18Ne
experiments are naturally limited to studying 22Mg
states above the 18Ne+a
threshold. Additional studies of 21Na+p resonances can
be carried out by measuring Gp/Gtot -
using the stable-beam coincidence techniques described in section
I.c. below. In fact this is currently planned as the first
new-physics experiment which we will carry out after our array,
after we finish commissioning tests. 21Na+p resonance
studies will also be carried out in 2001, utilizing the
21Na beam at TRIUMF/ISAC first to study
21Na(p,p) elastic scattering using the TUDA silicon
array and then to directly measure the 21Na(p,g)22Mg reaction using the DRAGON
spectrometer. We are collaborators on both of those experiments and
recently carried out tests of the DRAGON focal-plane detector at
Yale using our spectrometer.
c. Future Explosive Nucleosynthesis Projects
The focal-plane detector [see Section II.a.
below] which we developed for use with the Yale Enge split pole
provides a highly reliable and well understood instrument for
carrying out spectroscopic measurements of many nuclei of
importance to Nuclear Astrophysics. For example, various nuclei,
such as 22Mg, where the energy of the excited states is
tagged using the
12C(16O,6He)22Mg*
reaction or the nucleus 19Ne where states are tagged
using reactions such as
19F(3He,t)19Ne* or
12C(10B,t)19Ne*, have
been extensively studied using this instrument. Beginning in
September 2001, John D'Auria will be spending a sabbatical year
here at Yale during which time we will work on the analysis of the
21Na(p,g) data, as well as
studies of 20Na+p resonances in 21Mg using
stable-beam reactions such as
24Mg(3He,6He) together with our
split-pole spectrometer in order to design of an experiment to
subsequently measure the 20Na(p,g) reaction rate at TRIUMF.
With the addition of a large-solid-angle array of silicon
detectors in the scattering chamber, it will now be possible to
observe the coincidence between events on the focal plane and
charged-particle decays from the excited state of the residual
nucleus, by gating on a peak in the focal plane spectrum and
searching for particle decays from the corresponding excited state.
(Initial tests using a single surface-barrier detector to perform
coincidence measurements have indicated that a sensitivity to
branching ratios of » 3% can be
achieved.) Such coincidence experiments will measure the relevant
partial widths (Ga and Gp) and branching ratios for that
state. With such information, the calculation of the rates of
reactions involving radioactive nuclei, such as
21Na(p,g)22Mg, can
become possible, complementing the use of a radioactive beam or
target. The first coincidence experiment performed with our new
array will be a measurement of the proton decays of 22Mg
states of importance as resonances for the 21Na(p,g)22Mg* reaction. This same
reaction will then be used to look at the higher energy states in
22Mg (above the a-particle
threshold at 8.14 MeV) to measure the a-particle and proton branching ratios of states
important as resonances for the HotCNO-cycle break-out reaction,
18Ne(a,p)21Na (see above figure).
Additional measurements of interest include experiments such as
19F(3He,t)19Ne*(a)15O [looking at alpha decays
from states important to the Hot CNO cycle break out reaction
15O(a,g)19Ne], or
16O(3He,3He)16O*(a)12C, [to look at alpha decays
from excited 16O states with the intention of
determining the strength of the 12C(a,g)16O reaction], or
12C(12C,6He)18Ne
*(a/p)14O/17F [to look at a-particle and proton decays from the excited
states of 18Ne to determine the reaction rate for the
14O(a,p)17F and
17F(p,g)18Ne
reactions], and
25Mg(3He,6He)22Mg
*(a/p)18Ne/21Na [to study
22Mg through an alternate entrance channel].
At the same time, we will continue to be involved as active
members of RIB collaborations at ANL [working on the
21Na(p,a )18Ne
reaction], at TRIUMF [working on the 21Na(p,p) and
21Na(p,g) reactions], and at
ORNL/HRIBF [continuing our work on the 17F+p system, in
particular the 17F(p,p') and
17F(p,g) reactions, and working
on the 7Be(p,g) reaction, as
well as working towards the development and use of beams of
25Al and 33Cl]. In anticipation of the
possibility of future 25Al and 33Cl beams, we
have recently begun collaborating in studies of the locations of
25Al+p and 33Cl+p resonances using the
29Si(3He,6He)26Si and
12C(28Si,6He)34Ar
reactions, respectively. These measurements are being carried out
at Yale, using our split pole spectrometer, collaborating with
Caggiano et al. (ANL) (the 26Si study) and with Bardayan
et al. (UNC/TUNL) (the 34Ar study).
Instrumentation
a. The Yale Lamp Shade Array (YLSA)
The initial array will be made up
of five LEDA-type silicon strip detectors, mounted in a lampshade
configuration in the backward hemisphere of the scattering chamber.
The solid angle for looking at proton decays from 22Mg
excited states will be approximately 25% of the full solid angle in
the Lab, giving a high detection efficiency. The high segmentation
(16 azimuthal strips per detector) gives angular information for
every event and reduces the effects of pileup in both the ADC's and
the TDC's. The first three detectors have been purchased and will
be in place by the end of this summer. The electronics to implement
these detectors will consist of preamplifier circuits constructed
in Brookhaven National Laboratory, mounted on a motherboard which
allows 32 channels of electronics to be contained in a unit of
dimension 6"x2"x6". The preamplified signals will go through a
further stage of amplification using RAL109 amplifiers made by the
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory (UK). The preamplifiers are at
present undergoing final tests and should be available for use at
the end of this summer. The amplifier electronics is currently
being tested.
Due
to the flight time (~100 ns) of the 6He particle from
the target to the focal plane, it is necessary to delay the signals
from the Si-array. The event rate in the focal plane detector is of
order 100Hz, while that in the silicon array (with a solid angle of
p steradians) is of order 100 kHz.
Therefore, the focal plane, with its lower rate, will be used to
define the trigger, while the time signal for each channel in the
silicon array will be delayed by 300 ns to allow a time coincidence
to be made. The timing delay will be implemented using active ECL
delay chips, which take the ECL output of the RAL amplifier as
their input and delay the signal by 300 ns. The rise time, and
hence the resolution in time, is smaller using an active circuit to
produce the delay than in the case where an inductance-resistor
circuit is used, which typically degrades the voltage level in
addition to increasing the rise time of the logic pulse.
b. YLSA Data Acquisition
To reduce hardware
costs, a new front-end is being built for our acquisition system;
this will be VME, rather than CAMAC, based. New ADCs and TDC's for
the VME system (made by CAEN) allow 32 channels of electronics to
be contained in a single width VME module at a fraction of the cost
that would be possible using FERAbus electronics. Two further
advantages area that the acquisition system is now contained in one
crate rather than two and that the maximum acceptable event rate
will be higher. The software for this new system is currently being
written and is expected to be fully operational by the end of this
summer.
c. Jam
We have written a computer based data acquisition (DAQ) system,
Jam, using the Java programming language. Java has many high level
features which allow rapid development of complex programs,
allowing us to rapidly develop a user-friendly DAQ system with a
familiar graphical user interface which we believe makes it easier
to learn and use than other currently available DAQ systems. Our
philosophy in developing the system is that simplicity of use is a
higher priority than generality, at least as the program is
initially presented to the user. Setting up the acquisition system
is straightforward for the majority of cases. A paper describing
the system has been accepted for publication in Nuclear Instruments
and Methods in Research A. In the past year, we have been able to
make a number of improvements to Jam. The Java graphical user
interface has gone through a significant upgrade with the addition
of "swing" classes, and we have modified Jam to take advantage of
this upgrade. At present a stable beta version 1.2 of Jam is in use
for data acquisition at WNSL. At present, Jam is used at WNSL (by
the Nuclear Astrophysics group and by a number of visiting research
groups) as well as at TUNL (by their Nuclear Astrophysics
group).
Documentation of the system is available at http://jam-daq.sourceforge.net/
The new silicon array described in Section-b. above will have a
significant number of new electronics channels (90 energy + 90
time). For both simplicity and economy, we have chosen to convert
our data acquisition hardware to VME-based ADC and TDC modules.
Jam's front end is already programmed on a VME microprocessor
module, but at present it relies on a specific VME-to-CAMAC bus
module, with all digitization taking place in a CAMAC crate. Due to
the new electronics configuration, it will be necessary to modify
Jam to allow it to accept data from VME modules in an
event-by-event mode (as contrasted with a high-speed mode in which
every signal gets a time stamp associated with it). In addition, a
hierarchy will have to be introduced to the list of histograms
viewable in the Jam application, in order for the greatly increased
number of channels of information to be easily accessible. As noted
above, this new software is currently under development and is
expected to be operational by the end of the summer.
Nuclear Astrophysics Home
Last Modified
Wednesday, 30 March 2005
Send comments to the WNSL
Webmaster.
|
|